0.07/0.12 % Problem : Vampire---4.8_32488 : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 1440 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 180 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Jul 3 12:50:53 EDT 2023 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime : 0.19/0.47 Running higher-order theorem provingRunning: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.NUOYl3loHj/Vampire---4.8_32488 0.19/0.47 # Version: 3.1pre001-ho 0.19/0.47 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSLSNSFN. 0.19/0.47 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.19/0.47 # Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 900s (5) cores 0.19/0.47 # Starting post_as_ho5 with 180s (1) cores 0.19/0.47 # Starting sh4l with 180s (1) cores 0.19/0.47 # Starting ho_unfolding_2 with 180s (1) cores 0.19/0.47 # post_as_ho5 with pid 32667 completed with status 0 0.19/0.47 # Result found by post_as_ho5 0.19/0.47 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSLSNSFN. 0.19/0.47 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.19/0.47 # Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 900s (5) cores 0.19/0.47 # Starting post_as_ho5 with 180s (1) cores 0.19/0.47 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,true,1.0,0,2,20000,1.0,true) 0.19/0.47 # Search class: HGUSF-FFSF11-MSFFMMBN 0.19/0.47 # partial match(1): HGUSF-FFSF21-MSFFMMBN 0.19/0.47 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total) 0.19/0.47 # Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 98s (1) cores 0.19/0.47 # ho_unfolding_3 with pid 32670 completed with status 0 0.19/0.47 # Result found by ho_unfolding_3 0.19/0.47 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSLSNSFN. 0.19/0.47 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.19/0.47 # Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 900s (5) cores 0.19/0.47 # Starting post_as_ho5 with 180s (1) cores 0.19/0.47 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,true,1.0,0,2,20000,1.0,true) 0.19/0.47 # Search class: HGUSF-FFSF11-MSFFMMBN 0.19/0.47 # partial match(1): HGUSF-FFSF21-MSFFMMBN 0.19/0.47 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total) 0.19/0.47 # Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 98s (1) cores 0.19/0.47 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s 0.19/0.47 # Presaturation interreduction done 0.19/0.47 0.19/0.47 # Proof found! 0.19/0.47 # SZS status Theorem 0.19/0.47 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.19/0.47 thf(decl_22, type, c0: $i). 0.19/0.47 thf(decl_23, type, cS: $i > $i). 0.19/0.47 thf(decl_24, type, cEVEN1: $i > $o). 0.19/0.47 thf(decl_25, type, cODD1: $i > $o). 0.19/0.47 thf(decl_26, type, esk1_1: ($i > $o) > $i). 0.19/0.47 thf(decl_27, type, esk2_1: $i > $i). 0.19/0.47 thf(cODD1_def, axiom, ((cODD1)=(^[X1:$i]:(~((cEVEN1 @ X1))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.NUOYl3loHj/Vampire---4.8_32488', cODD1_def)). 0.19/0.47 thf(cEVEN1_def, axiom, ((cEVEN1)=(^[X1:$i]:(![X2:$i > $o]:((((X2 @ c0)&![X3:$i]:(((X2 @ X3)=>(X2 @ (cS @ (cS @ X3))))))=>(X2 @ X1)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.NUOYl3loHj/Vampire---4.8_32488', cEVEN1_def)). 0.19/0.47 thf(cTHM406, conjecture, ((cODD1 @ (cS @ c0))<=(![X4:$i, X5:$i]:((((cS @ X4)=(cS @ X5))=>((X4)=(X5))))&![X6:$i]:(((cS @ X6)!=(c0))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.NUOYl3loHj/Vampire---4.8_32488', cTHM406)). 0.19/0.47 thf(c_0_3, plain, ((cODD1)=(^[Z0/* 7 */:$i]:(~((![X10:$i > $o]:((((X10 @ c0)&![X11:$i]:(((X10 @ X11)=>(X10 @ (cS @ (cS @ X11))))))=>(X10 @ Z0)))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cODD1_def])). 0.19/0.47 thf(c_0_4, plain, ((cEVEN1)=(^[Z0/* 6 */:$i]:(![X2:$i > $o]:((((X2 @ c0)&![X3:$i]:(((X2 @ X3)=>(X2 @ (cS @ (cS @ X3))))))=>(X2 @ Z0)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cEVEN1_def])). 0.19/0.47 thf(c_0_5, plain, ((cODD1)=(^[Z0/* 7 */:$i]:(~((![X10:$i > $o]:((((X10 @ c0)&![X11:$i]:(((X10 @ X11)=>(X10 @ (cS @ (cS @ X11))))))=>(X10 @ Z0)))))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_3, c_0_4])). 0.19/0.47 thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ~(((![X4:$i, X5:$i]:((((cS @ X4)=(cS @ X5))=>((X4)=(X5))))&![X6:$i]:(((cS @ X6)!=(c0))))=>~(![X12:$i > $o]:((((X12 @ c0)&![X13:$i]:(((X12 @ X13)=>(X12 @ (cS @ (cS @ X13))))))=>(X12 @ (cS @ c0))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTHM406]), c_0_5])])). 0.19/0.48 thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ![X14:$i, X15:$i, X16:$i, X17:$i > $o]:((((((cS @ X14)!=(cS @ X15))|((X14)=(X15)))&((cS @ X16)!=(c0)))&(((X17 @ (esk1_1 @ X17))|~(X17 @ c0)|(X17 @ (cS @ c0)))&(~(X17 @ (cS @ (cS @ (esk1_1 @ X17))))|~(X17 @ c0)|(X17 @ (cS @ c0)))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])])])). 0.19/0.48 thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X3:$i]:((((X1)=(X3))|((cS @ X1)!=(cS @ X3)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])). 0.19/0.48 thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i > $o]:(((X2 @ (cS @ c0))|~((X2 @ (cS @ (cS @ (esk1_1 @ X2)))))|~((X2 @ c0)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])). 0.19/0.48 thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i]:(((cS @ X1)!=(c0))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])). 0.19/0.48 thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i]:(((esk2_1 @ (cS @ X1))=(X1))), inference(recognize_injectivity,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])). 0.19/0.48 thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ((cS @ (cS @ (esk1_1 @ (^[Z0/* 4 */:$i]:(((Z0)!=(cS @ c0)))))))=(cS @ c0)), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(eliminate_leibniz_eq,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[]), c_0_9]), c_0_10])). 0.19/0.48 thf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11, c_0_12]), c_0_11]), c_0_10]), ['proof']). 0.19/0.48 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.19/0.48 # Parsed axioms : 7 0.19/0.48 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 4 0.19/0.48 # Initial clauses : 4 0.19/0.48 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0 0.19/0.48 # Initial clauses in saturation : 4 0.19/0.48 # Processed clauses : 14 0.19/0.48 # ...of these trivial : 0 0.19/0.48 # ...subsumed : 2 0.19/0.48 # ...remaining for further processing : 12 0.19/0.48 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0 0.19/0.48 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.19/0.48 # Backward-subsumed : 0 0.19/0.48 # Backward-rewritten : 0 0.19/0.48 # Generated clauses : 14 0.19/0.48 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 9 0.19/0.48 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0 0.19/0.48 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0 0.19/0.48 # Paramodulations : 6 0.19/0.48 # Factorizations : 0 0.19/0.48 # NegExts : 0 0.19/0.48 # Equation resolutions : 1 0.19/0.48 # Total rewrite steps : 1 0.19/0.48 # Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.19/0.48 # Propositional check models : 0 0.19/0.48 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.19/0.48 # Propositional clauses : 0 0.19/0.48 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.19/0.48 # Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.19/0.48 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.19/0.48 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.19/0.48 # Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.19/0.48 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.19/0.48 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.19/0.48 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.19/0.48 # Current number of processed clauses : 8 0.19/0.48 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 3 0.19/0.48 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 0.19/0.48 # Negative unit clauses : 2 0.19/0.48 # Non-unit-clauses : 3 0.19/0.48 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1 0.19/0.48 # ...number of literals in the above : 2 0.19/0.48 # Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.19/0.48 # Current number of archived clauses : 4 0.19/0.48 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 4 0.19/0.48 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4 0.19/0.48 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0 0.19/0.48 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0 0.19/0.48 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.19/0.48 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1 0.19/0.48 # BW rewrite match successes : 0 0.19/0.48 # Condensation attempts : 14 0.19/0.48 # Condensation successes : 0 0.19/0.48 # Termbank termtop insertions : 711 0.19/0.48 0.19/0.48 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.19/0.48 # User time : 0.003 s 0.19/0.48 # System time : 0.002 s 0.19/0.48 # Total time : 0.005 s 0.19/0.48 # Maximum resident set size: 1748 pages 0.19/0.48 0.19/0.48 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.19/0.48 # User time : 0.004 s 0.19/0.48 # System time : 0.004 s 0.19/0.48 # Total time : 0.008 s 0.19/0.48 # Maximum resident set size: 1708 pages 0.19/0.48 % E---3.1 exiting 0.19/0.48 EOF